WHY no file extensions in FFox cache?????

Here you can find everything you need to know about Dll-Files. You can also share your knowledge regarding the topic.

Moderators: DllAdmin, DLLADMIN ONLY

devilspgd
Posts: 6
Joined: 06 May 2009, 23:00

Re: WHY no file extensions in FFox cache?????

Post by devilspgd »

In message <eLwkENq0JHA.3988@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl> MEB
<meb-not-here@hotmail.com> was claimed to have wrote:

> I had noticed the ad white lists [call me paranoid but I check
>EVERYTHING for defaults and functionality, in fact I had to removed them
>from this Linux/FireFox install, along with Google and others. I can see
>why they were included: Google for gmail, search [but I never allow
>anything there], and webmaster tools (but that also allows that danged
>Google API found EVERYWHERE); Microsoft/MSN for hotmail/Live; but that
>wasn't the killer it may have been for others. Delete them from the
>white list...

Any chance you're talking about AdBlock with Filterset.G? Adblock Plus
and Easylist doesn't appear to use any whitelists by default.

Filterset.G did, but not because they wanted to show ads, instead their
whitelists were mainly focused around fixing compatibility issues caused
by over-agressive blacklisting.

Adblock Plus' approach is a little more refined, preferring to write
blocking rules more narrowly. A quick glance through AdBlock Plus plus
EasyList (the default ruleset) doesn't show any whitelists/exceptions.

mike easter
Posts: 6
Joined: 06 May 2009, 23:00

Re: WHY no file extensions in FFox cache?????

Post by mike easter »

J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:

> I don't think I've ever used that combination; to close things, I use
> Alt-space then C, which I can do with minimal stretching.

No stretching is necessary if you use sticky keys, which I think is a near
necessity for any modifier key plus anything.

--
Mike Easter

pcr
Posts: 53
Joined: 05 Apr 2009, 23:00

Re: WHY no file extensions in FFox cache?????

Post by pcr »

Mike Easter wrote:
> J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
>
>> I don't think I've ever used that combination; to close things, I use
>> Alt-space then C, which I can do with minimal stretching.

I see no such post with those words in it but this one. It's true the
combination you speak of works without stretching-- but you'll get fat
fingers that way! And eventually you'll squash the keyboard!

> No stretching is necessary if you use sticky keys, which I think is a
> near necessity for any modifier key plus anything.

You are the laziest one yet in this whole thread-- including the
invisible posters!


--
Thanks or Good Luck,
There may be humor in this post, and,
Naturally, you will not sue,
Should things get worse after this,
PCR
pcrrcp@netzero.net

mike easter
Posts: 6
Joined: 06 May 2009, 23:00

Re: WHY no file extensions in FFox cache?????

Post by mike easter »

PCR wrote:
> Mike Easter wrote:

>> No stretching is necessary if you use sticky keys, which I think is a
>> near necessity for any modifier key plus anything.
>
> You are the laziest one yet in this whole thread-- including the
> invisible posters!

I'm sure I'm the lazy one, but, *How Did You Know That?*



--
Mike Easter

pcr
Posts: 53
Joined: 05 Apr 2009, 23:00

Re: WHY no file extensions in FFox cache?????

Post by pcr »

Mike Easter wrote:
> PCR wrote:
>> Mike Easter wrote:
>
>>> No stretching is necessary if you use sticky keys, which I think is
>>> a near necessity for any modifier key plus anything.
>>
>> You are the laziest one yet in this whole thread-- including the
>> invisible posters!
>
> I'm sure I'm the lazy one, but, *How Did You Know That?*

You are unwilling to stretch the distance from the space key to the "c"
key! :-). No -- who knows? -- that sticky keys thing might give
thanatoid his "z" & "x" shortcuts back in a browser of his choosing.
Very good.


--
Thanks or Good Luck,
There may be humor in this post, and,
Naturally, you will not sue,
Should things get worse after this,
PCR
pcrrcp@netzero.net

Post Reply