ActiveX - DirectShow vulnerability

Here you can find everything you need to know about Dll-Files. You can also share your knowledge regarding the topic.

Moderators: DllAdmin, DLLADMIN ONLY

meb
Posts: 116
Joined: 04 Oct 2009, 23:00

Re: ActiveX - DirectShow vulnerability

Post by meb »

On 07/17/2009 09:21 AM, 98 Guy wrote:
> MEB spewed:
>
>> Heck, let's use 98 Guy as an example... arguing that a worm running
>> rampant through numerous networks such as FaceBook, Twitter and the
>> others, ISN'T a worm... because he can't understand the concept that
>> it IS a worm working its way THROUGH *those networks*...
>
> Koobface is not actually hosted on *those networks*. Don't you
> understand that?
>
> I wouldn't even call facebook, twitter, etc, I wouldn't even call them
> networks. They are single, individual, stand-alone message or content
> portals or servers. There is no "network" functionality with them (at
> least not on a hardware or machine level).
>
>> because he can't understand the concept that it IS a worm working
>> its way THROUGH *those networks*...
>
> By that definition, all malware qualifies as being worms, because all
> malware seeks to (and usually does) "worm" their way into many
> internet-connected (or lan-connected) PC's.
>
> Once upon a time, a worm was supposed to denote a piece of malware that
> was capable of spreading itself directly to other machines without
> requiring the assistance of a third machine acting like a server. I
> believe going so far to be able to spread autonomously - without
> requiring human intervention, activity or assistance.
>
> Koob does not spread from one machine directly to another. Koob only
> spreads by being downloaded from a server to the next victim.
>
> All malware wants to spread to as many machines as possible, and by your
> reasoning that makes the entire malware class (viruses, trojans, etc)
> qualify as being worms, making the definition or term "worm" useless or
> redundant.
>
>> to him, he only sees the outcome of the worms activity thinking
>> that's the issue, rather than the RESULTS...
>
> So you're saying that "outcome" is somehow different than "results" ?
>
> This, people, is an example of MEB-speak at it's best.

And I leave this in its entirety as an example of how completely
uninformed this 98 Guy is, and how ludicrous his arguments and
understanding truly are.

I suggest EVERY forum and USENET group, and ALL security related
sites, place a *sticky* related to this entity so all parties NOW AND IN
THE FUTURE might understand and be WARNED regarding the extent of 98
Guy's ability to understand and comprehend issues related to security,
methodology, and other related to their protection and security.
BE FOREWARNED, this entity has ZERO understanding of anything
necessary for your protection.

--
~
--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm
Windows Diagnostics, Security, Networking
http://peoplescounsel.org
The *REAL WORLD* of Law, Justice, and Government
_______

meb
Posts: 116
Joined: 04 Oct 2009, 23:00

Re: ActiveX - DirectShow vulnerability

Post by meb »

On 07/19/2009 09:54 AM, 98 Guy wrote:
> MEB wrote:
>
>> And I leave this in its entirety as an example of how completely
>> uninformed this 98 Guy is, and how ludicrous his arguments and
>> understanding truly are.
>>
>> I suggest EVERY forum and USENET group, and ALL security related
>> sites, place a *sticky* related to this entity so all parties NOW
>> AND IN THE FUTURE might understand and be WARNED regarding the
>> extent of 98 Guy's ability to understand and comprehend issues
>> related to security, methodology, and other related to their
>> protection and security.
>>
>> BE FOREWARNED, this entity has ZERO understanding of anything
>> necessary for your protection.
>> --
>> MEB
>
> I have filed a complaint of slander and defamation of character against
> you with the Geauga County Prosecutors Office. You should expect to be
> served this week.

Oh boy, can't wait... so who did you file against and how did you
file... are you prepared to appear during trial???

Of course you fail to realize that YOU must file a CIVIL complaint in
which YOU supply your actual name and address ON THE COMPLAINT, and
anything else I subpoena during pendency... I would suggest you get a
REAL GOOD law firm ...

So is it that you did or do too many drugs, is this what your problem
is ... I mean there has to be some reason you have no idea what the
world is all about...

--
~
--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm
Windows Diagnostics, Security, Networking
http://peoplescounsel.org
The *REAL WORLD* of Law, Justice, and Government
_______

Post Reply