MS09-054: Cumulative security update for Internet Explorer

[meb]

98 Guy wrote:
> MEB wrote:
>

WARNING DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS

The entity above, for which this post was applied to, has been
repeatedly identified as troll and Usenet abuser.
Please do NOT respond to this entity or what they post,
This was an attempt by this entity to bring a useless discussion and
will likely contain NOTHING of value, EVEN IF IT MAY APPEAR SO. Useless
purported arguments will be submitted to which you are supposed to
respond to so they can then have something to do.
Moreover, will cause this entity to abuse any responders who take issue
with what might be posted.
I am creating web pages to show the exact reasons for this
identification and will post links in this WARNING as they are added.
Note specifically the parties which engage in discussion with this party.
The terms related to that type of activity are troll and sockpuppets.

[meb]

Greg wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:11:47 -0400, MEB <MEB-not-here@hotmail.com>
>
> Meb, please stop the repeating troll advisory stuff. I am not
> saying you are a troll but by repeating the troll advisory, you doing
> exactly what a troll does. If you keep it up, I going to have to
> put you on the kill file. Which, I know that you don't want, if
> you are trying to prove your point. Plus it get a little annoying to
> read the troll stuff over and over and over and over.
>
> Thank You,
>
> Greg

Greg, stop being a troll and I will stop posting the materials.

--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm
Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking
http://peoplescounsel.org
The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government
___---

[meb]

98 Guy wrote:
> MEB wrote:
>
>> Greg, stop being a troll and I will stop posting the materials.
>
> How is it being a troll when someone composes a response to your
> postings?
>
> Do you have no other way to handle coherent conversation than by acting
> like a juvenille?

You got three days of my time. You owe me $1500.00 in time.

--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm
Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking
http://peoplescounsel.org
The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government
___---

[meb]

MEB wrote:
> 98 Guy wrote:
>> MEB wrote:
>>
>>> Greg, stop being a troll and I will stop posting the materials.
>> How is it being a troll when someone composes a response to your
>> postings?
>>
>> Do you have no other way to handle coherent conversation than by acting
>> like a juvenille?
>
> You got three days of my time. You owe me $1500.00 in time.
>
CORRECTION:

I forgot how long this had gone on,, you owe me for 10 days...

EVERYTHING has already been covered, go back and read it. There is
nothing for your useless purported arguments to now raise.

--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm
Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking
http://peoplescounsel.org
The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government
___---

[greg]

On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:40:32 -0400, MEB <MEB-not-here@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>Greg wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:11:47 -0400, MEB <MEB-not-here@hotmail.com>
>>
>> Meb, please stop the repeating troll advisory stuff. I am not
>> saying you are a troll but by repeating the troll advisory, you doing
>> exactly what a troll does. If you keep it up, I going to have to
>> put you on the kill file. Which, I know that you don't want, if
>> you are trying to prove your point. Plus it get a little annoying to
>> read the troll stuff over and over and over and over.
>>
>> Thank You,
>>
>> Greg
>
> Greg, stop being a troll and I will stop posting the materials.

I am not a troll.

Greg

[rasta robert]

On 2009-10-29, MEB <MEB-not-here@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> WARNING DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS
>

Stop spamming the same text over and over, please.

[bill blanton]

"Rasta Robert" <rr@dds.nl.ReMoVe_ThIs.invalid> wrote in message news:slrnhek09k.1j8k.rr@xs6.xs4all.nl...
> On 2009-10-29, MEB <MEB-not-here@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> WARNING DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS
>>
>
> Stop spamming the same text over and over, please.

I second the motion..

It's become ridiculous.

[meb]

Bill Blanton wrote:
> "Rasta Robert" <rr@dds.nl.ReMoVe_ThIs.invalid> wrote in message news:slrnhek09k.1j8k.rr@xs6.xs4all.nl...
>> On 2009-10-29, MEB <MEB-not-here@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> WARNING DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS
>>>
>> Stop spamming the same text over and over, please.
>
> I second the motion..
>
> It's become ridiculous.
>

I have a recommendation, stop posting in this discussion since the
Summary and Conclusion was placed.

--
MEB

[greg]

On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:16:15 -0400, 98 Guy <98@Guy.com> wrote:

>MEB wrote:
>
>> >> Stop spamming the same text over and over, please.
>> >
>> > I second the motion..
>> >
>> > It's become ridiculous.
>> >
>>
>> I have a recommendation, stop posting in this discussion since
>> the Summary and Conclusion was placed.
>
>That's not how it works Maurice.
>
>You don't get to call the shots around here.
>
>You only get to prove what an infantile fool you are by throwing your
>spam tantrums.
>
>Keep it up. It will only result in getting kill-filed by more people.


Since, when does MEB, gets say the summary and conclusion was
placed? Plus, I never saw it.

Also,
The discussion was not over. MEB just started calling me a sock
puppet and a troll. Which I am neither. The only reason he/she did
that because I didn't agree with him/her on the files not being more
unsecure then the orginal files. myself, I belive the files are ok
to install but may not be more secure then the original files. Myself
I would install them if you use I.E. a lot. I don't belive they are
unsecure if installed. However, there is a chance the files could
be more secure than the orginal files. As far as the directx files,
the jury is still out on that.

For some reason, MEB, thinks it will make I.E. 6 unsecure. Which I
doubt.



Greg

[meb]

For *you* to continue in this discussion YOU have to supply test
results proving the safety of these files and no adverse impact.
Where are the links to those test results.

--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm
Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking
http://peoplescounsel.org
The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government
___---

[meb]

>
> Since, when does MEB, gets say the summary and conclusion was
> placed? Plus, I never saw it.
>
> Also,
> The discussion was not over. MEB just started calling me a sock
> puppet and a troll. Which I am neither. The only reason he/she did
> that because I didn't agree with him/her on the files not being more
> unsecure then the orginal files. myself, I belive the files are ok
> to install but may not be more secure then the original files. Myself
> I would install them if you use I.E. a lot. I don't belive they are
> unsecure if installed. However, there is a chance the files could
> be more secure than the orginal files. As far as the directx files,
> the jury is still out on that.
>
> For some reason, MEB, thinks it will make I.E. 6 unsecure. Which I
> doubt.
>
>
>
> Greg

For you to continue in this discussion of YOUR support for the
installation of these files, REQUIRES YOU to provide the tests results
which prove the safety and no adverse activities leveraged upon the
present EOL Win9X and resultant IE6SP1.
Where are your tests results, provide the links to those test results
and materials which prove those issues.

--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm
Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking
http://peoplescounsel.org
The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government
___---