Windows Media Player 10 for Windows 98

[meb]

On 12/12/2009 01:43 AM, Sunny wrote:
> "MEB" <MEB-not-here@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:eoqF0UveKHA.6096@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> You would have already SEEN these test and things if you weren't just a
>> recently "out of diapers" computer user in this group...
>> Go see mommy, I think you messed your pants...
>
> And you consider yourself an adult?
>
>

What's wrong Sunny, did they shut down the group you used to hang out
in?? HMMM. Awe too bad, guess we'll be seeing more of your witty charm
and vast intellectual capabilities in here...

--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm
Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking
http://peoplescounsel.org
The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government
___---

[meb]

On 12/12/2009 02:12 AM, Sunny wrote:
> "MEB" <MEB-not-here@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:O9zuhlveKHA.2460@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> On 12/12/2009 01:43 AM, Sunny wrote:
>>> "MEB" <MEB-not-here@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:eoqF0UveKHA.6096@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>> You would have already SEEN these test and things if you weren't just
>>>> a
>>>> recently "out of diapers" computer user in this group...
>>>> Go see mommy, I think you messed your pants...
>>>
>>> And you consider yourself an adult?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> What's wrong Sunny, did they shut down the group you used to hang out
>> in?? HMMM. Awe too bad, guess we'll be seeing more of your witty charm
>> and vast intellectual capabilities in here...
>
> You won't, you don't participate on Usenet, remember?

And where, pray tell, have you come up with that notion... do you ever
actually READ what's posted...

>
> One thing I have never done, unlike you, is claim "vast intellectual
> capabilities"
> You are a hero in your mirror, it just doesn't work for you in the real
> World.
>
>

Yep, you go again... hehehehehe.... so did you have anything
intelligent to say, about ANYTHING... anything at all?????

--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm
Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking
http://peoplescounsel.org
The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government
___---

["j. p. gilliver]

In message <uJ5kXukeKHA.3792@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>, MEB
<MEB-not-here@hotmail.com> writes:
[]
>>> These are DEFINITELY *not* the way to achieve longer use of the 9X OS.
>>
>> Perhaps you could say what _is_ - other than keeping it in aspic, virgin
>> and untouched? Thinking about it, I don't think I have ever seen YOU
>> post anything about any update, for any part of '98. Maybe you've never
>> found any that satisfy your rigorous testing requirements.
>
> You're wasting my time...
>
Abuse rather than answering the question. Normal.
>>
>>> What part instill NEW AND UNKNOWN vulnerabilities escapes your mental
>>> faculties. Or is it you think that these provide fixes when they are NOT
>>> designed for the 9X OS and the way IT functions, AND are completely
>>> unknown to any available protections used with the 9X OS protection
>>> applications. Perhaps its just that you don't think...
>>>
>> Whisper this quietly: maybe they DO provide fixes (in the form of extra
>> functionality), but DO introduce new vulnerabilities at the same time!
>
> Okay, *YOU* provide the test results; SHOW 9X users they provide
>functionality and no new vulnerabilities... give them something to
>review so they can make an intelligent and informed decision...
>
As another said, you don't get to give orders. Whoever these
hypothetical people are, all they have to go on is: 98Guy posts some
references to files, which he says (without proof) may add some
functionality and may patch some vulnerabilities; you, whenever he does,
reflexly (I know that's not a word) post a warning that these have not
been tested to military standards and may introduce new vulnerabilities
(also without proof). These hypothetical people have to decide which of
you to believe. Or, you post a warning about new vulnerabilities taken
from somewhere else, and someone else (I think it's 98g) reflexly posts
the response "are these relevant to 98". Again, people have to make up
their own minds, since you don't provide any proof that they are, and he
doesn't that they're not.
[]
>> For once I will refrain from saying why don't you provide some, because
>> as I say I can't remember - recently, anyway - you providing any details
>> of any updates at all.
>
> BECAUSE THERE ARE NONE... 9X is EOL. It ended support life with a
>finite set of vulnerabilities, change those and you have NO idea what
>you do have.

Or don't change them; you still don't know what you have (unless
_possibly_ you're an expert of very high calibre; certainly not the
average or even above-average user). I think that's the nub of the
problem.

> You want fixes then do like you're SUPPOSED to do, search for
>programmers providing ACTUAL DESIGNED FOR 9X applications... guess what,
>there are some still doing so.
>
Make your mind up, there either are people (not necessarily within MS)
supporting 98, or there aren't.
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G.5AL-IS-P--Ch++(p)Ar@T0H+Sh0!:`)DNAf
** http://www.soft255.demon.co.uk/G6JPG-PC/JPGminPC.htm for ludicrously
outdated thoughts on PCs. **

"Bother,"saidPoohwhenhisspacebarrefusedtowork.

[gatsmark01]

I have windows media player 10...It is working fine...
is it compatible with windows server 2003....

If you any idea about it please let me know...

Thanks




--
gatsmark01

[jeff richards]

There is an excellent example of some "testing" here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg ... &id=512005

(skip to the bottom unless you want to trawl through all the abuse).
--
Jeff Richards
----------------------------------------

"98 Guy" <98@Guy.com> wrote in message news:4B2797D6.7C384058@Guy.com...
> snip <
>
> Why would anyone believe a blow-hard like MEB? He claims to have all
> this background and experience with testing, yet he doesn't lift a
> finger to test these files according to his own criteria.

[meb]

On 12/23/2009 10:53 PM, 98 Guy wrote:
> Jeff Richards wrote:
>
>> There is an excellent example of some "testing" here:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg ... &id=512005
>
> Ya, well, you're probably using the term "testing" loosely.
>
> This isin't really an example of testing as much as it is a cry-baby who
> wants someone to fix something that isin't working right.
>
>> (skip to the bottom unless you want to trawl through all the abuse).
>
> Dude. The abuse is the best part!
>
> -> "And please stop being a dick."
>
> It's clear that MEB never read "How to win friends and influence
> people".
>
> I guess we know where he goes to abuse people when he's not lurking
> around here.
>
> I find this particularly hillarious and strange:
>
> "It appears that Red Hat is traded on the markets (...)"
>
> Where was he going with that? Was he going to short Red Hat?

You people really must have some mental issues prevalent in Australia
and where ever, if you can't figure out where that material went and
what it accomplished.

As for the testing, you might want to review the some of the other bug
reports handled by those parties. THEIR claim is its cutting edge, and
that they should ship these versions out-the-door regardless of fitness
and not worry about what damage and affect other's coding may have on
their own; seems they have taken a page from Microsoft's book..

As for you two, seems you can't figure much out at all. Maybe you need
mommy to help you with some explanations.

--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm
Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking
http://peoplescounsel.org
The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government
___---

[meb]

On 12/24/2009 01:23 AM, Sunny wrote:
> "98 Guy" <98@Guy.com> wrote in message news:4B32E5B9.D4431235@Guy.com...
>> Jeff Richards wrote:
>>
>>> There is an excellent example of some "testing" here:
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg ... &id=512005
>>
>> Ya, well, you're probably using the term "testing" loosely.
>>
>> This isin't really an example of testing as much as it is a cry-baby who
>> wants someone to fix something that isin't working right.
>>
>>> (skip to the bottom unless you want to trawl through all the abuse).
>>
>> Dude. The abuse is the best part!
>>
>> -> "And please stop being a dick."
>>
>> It's clear that MEB never read "How to win friends and influence
>> people".
>>
>> I guess we know where he goes to abuse people when he's not lurking
>> around here.
>>
>> I find this particularly hillarious and strange:
>>
>> "It appears that Red Hat is traded on the markets (...)"
>>
>> Where was he going with that? Was he going to short Red Hat?
>
> I like the bit where he threatens the use of his web site for another
> "whinge"
>
>

It was done, the page directed to those AT REDHAT and has made an
impact. Now what have the three of you done to affect ANYTHING on this
planet that might benefit others... besides this hogwash you constantly
spew...

--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm
Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking
http://peoplescounsel.org
The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government
___---

[sjouke burry]

MEB wrote:

> It was done, the page directed to those AT REDHAT and has made an
> impact. Now what have the three of you done to affect ANYTHING on this
> planet that might benefit others... besides this hogwash you constantly
> spew...
>
Oh what fun , a troll with 54 bullshit responses accusing somebody
else..........
Paid by M$ and InXXl as well I suspect.....